Paper detail

Are signatures of anti-de-Sitter black hole at the Galactic Center?

Using Schwarzschild -- de-Sitter (Kottler) metric we derive a simple analytical relation between a shadow size and $Λ$-term. Current observations of the smallest spot to evaluate shadow size at the Galactic Center do not reach an accuracy comparable with cosmological $Λ$-term $\sim 10^{-52}{\rm m}^{-2}$, however, if in reality we have dark energy instead of a constant $Λ$-term then dark energy may be a function depending on time and space and it could be approximated with a local constant $Λ$-term near the Galactic Center and it is important to introduce a procedure to evaluate the $Λ$-term. We suggest such a procedure based on a black hole shadow evaluation. Surprisingly, current observational estimates of shadows are in agreement with anti-de-Sitter spacetimes corresponding to a negative $Λ$-term which is about $-0.4\times 10^{-20}{\rm m}^{-2}$. A negative $Λ$-term has been predicted in the framework of a some class of multidimensional string models.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.