Paper detail

Are Quantum-Classical Hybrids compatible with Ontological Cellular Automata?

Based on the concept of ontological states and their dynamical evolution by permutations, as assumed in the Cellular Automaton Interpretation (CAI) of quantum mechanics, we address the issue whether quantum-classical hybrids can be described consistently in this framework. We consider chains of 'classical' two-state Ising spins and their discrete deterministic dynamics as an ontological model with an unitary evolution operator generated by pair exchange interactions. A simple error mechanism is identified, which turns them into quantum mechanical objects, chains of qubits. Consequently, an interaction between a quantum mechanical and a 'classical' chain can be introduced and its consequences for this quantum-classical hybrid be studied. We find that such hybrid character of composites, generally, does not persist under interactions and, therefore, cannot be upheld consistently, or even as a fundamental notion as in Kopenhagen interpretation, within CAI.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.