Paper detail

Are peculiar velocity surveys competitive as a cosmological probe?

Peculiar velocity surveys, which measure galaxy peculiar velocities directly from standard candles in addition to redshifts, can provide strong constraints on the linear growth rate of cosmological large-scale structure at low redshift. The improvement originates from the physical relationship between galaxy density and peculiar velocity, which substantially reduces cosmic variance. We present the results of Fisher matrix forecasts of correlated fields of galaxy density and velocity. Peculiar velocity can improve the growth rate constraints by about a factor of two compared to density alone, if we can use all the information for wavenumber k < 0.2 h/Mpc. Future peculiar velocity surveys, TAIPAN, and the all-sky HI surveys, WALLABY and WNSHS, can measure the growth rate, f*sigma8 to 3 per cent at z ~ 0.025. Although the velocity subsample is about an order of magnitude smaller than the redshift sample from the same survey, it improves the constraint by 40 per cent compared to the same survey without velocity measurements. Peculiar velocity surveys can also measure the growth rate as a function of wavenumber with 15-30 per cent uncertainties in bins with widths 0.01 h/Mpc in the range 0.02 h/Mpc < k < 0.1 h/Mpc, which is a large improvement over galaxy density only. Such measurements on very large scales can detect signatures of modified gravity or non-Gaussianity through scale-dependent growth rate or galaxy bias. We use N-body simulations to improve the modelling of auto- and cross-power spectra of galaxy density and peculiar velocity by introducing a new redshift-space distortion term to the velocity, which has been neglected in previous studies. The velocity power spectrum has a damping in redshift space, which is larger than that naively expected from the similar effect in the galaxy power spectrum.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.