Paper detail

Are Pebble Pile Planetesimals Doomed?

In parabolic flight experiments we studied the wind induced erosion of granular beds composed of spherical glass beads at low gravity and low ambient pressure. Varying g-levels were set by centrifugal forces. Expanding existing parameter sets to a pressure range between $p=300-1200\,$Pa and to g-levels of $g=1.1-2.2\,\rm m\,s^{-2}$ erosion thresholds are still consistent with the existing model for wind erosion on planetary surfaces by Shao & Lu (2000). These parameters were the lowest values that could technically be reached by the experiment. The experiments decrease the necessary range of extrapolation of erosion thresholds from verified to currently still unknown values at the conditions of planetesimals in protoplanetary discs. We apply our results to the stability of planetesimals. In inner regions of protoplanetary discs, pebble pile planetesimals below a certain size are not stable but will be disassembled by a head wind.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.