Paper detail

Are observed H i filaments turbulent illusions or density structures? Velocity caustics, facts and fakes

Context. The interstellar medium is affected by turbulence and observed H i structures in channel maps are shaped by turbulent motions. It is taken for granted by a few theoreticians that observed H i structures do not represent real density enhancement but velocity caustics, caused by velocity crowding. This interpretation was questioned and objections by Clark et al. led to violent debates. Aims. To settle the discussion we verify theoretical key parameters by using Effelsberg Bonn H i Survey (EBHIS) observations. Methods. We apply unsharp masking to determine filamentary H i structures at high spatial frequencies. In addition we use Gaussian parameters to distinguish the cold neutral medium (CNM) from observed H i column densities. We compare power spectra and spatial distributions of dust and H i column densities, distinguishing CNM and multiphase column densities at various velocity widths. Results. Observations contradict the Velocity Channel Analysis (VCA) postulate that the spectral index should steepen with the width of the velocity window. We rather find that the thin slice spectral index depends strongly on the H i phase composition. Multiphase power spectra are steeper for regions with cold gas. VCA denies such H i phase dependencies on the power distribution. Separating the CNM we find that the power spectra are significantly flatter than those for the multiphase H i composite. We observe excess CNM power for small scale structures originating from cold dust bearing filaments that are embedded in the CNM. Spectral indices for narrow channel widths depend on the Doppler temperature of the H i gas. In presence of enhanced small scale H i structure the far infrared emission from dust is also enhanced. Conclusions. Small scale cold filamentary H i structures are predominantly caused by density enhancements due to phase transitions rather than by velocity caustics.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.