Paper detail

Are Most Low-Luminosity AGN Really Obscured?

At low Eddington ratio (mdot), two effects make it harder to detect AGN given some selection criteria. First, even with fixed accretion physics, AGN are diluted/less luminous relative to their hosts; the magnitude of this depends on host properties and so on luminosity and redshift. Second, they may transition to a radiatively inefficient state, changing SED shape and dramatically decreasing in optical/IR luminosity. These effects lead to differences in observed AGN samples, even at fixed bolometric luminosity and after correction for obscuration. The true Eddington ratio distribution may depend strongly on luminosity, but this will be seen only in surveys robust to dilution and radiative inefficiency (X-ray or narrow-line samples); selection effects imply that AGN in optical samples will have uniformly high mdot. This also implies that different selection methods yield systems with different hosts: the clustering of faint optical/IR sources will be weaker than that of X-ray sources, and optical/IR Seyferts will reside in more disk-dominated galaxies while X-ray selected Seyferts will preferentially occupy early-type systems. If observed mdot distributions are correct, a large fraction of low-luminosity AGN currently classified as 'obscured' are in fact diluted and/or radiatively inefficient, not obscured by gas or dust. This is equally true if X-ray hardness is used as a proxy for obscuration, since radiatively inefficient SEDs near mdot~0.01 are X-ray hard. These effects can explain most of the claimed luminosity/redshift dependence in the 'obscured' AGN population, with the true obscured fraction as low as 20%.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.