Paper detail

Are Facial Attributes Adversarially Robust?

Facial attributes are emerging soft biometrics that have the potential to reject non-matches, for example, based on mismatching gender. To be usable in stand-alone systems, facial attributes must be extracted from images automatically and reliably. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective solution for automatic facial attribute extraction by training a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for each facial attribute separately, without using any pre-training or dataset augmentation, and we obtain new state-of-the-art facial attribute classification results on the CelebA benchmark. To test the stability of the networks, we generated adversarial images -- formed by adding imperceptible non-random perturbations to original inputs which result in classification errors -- via a novel fast flipping attribute (FFA) technique. We show that FFA generates more adversarial examples than other related algorithms, and that DCNNs for certain attributes are generally robust to adversarial inputs, while DCNNs for other attributes are not. This result is surprising because no DCNNs tested to date have exhibited robustness to adversarial images without explicit augmentation in the training procedure to account for adversarial examples. Finally, we introduce the concept of natural adversarial samples, i.e., images that are misclassified but can be easily turned into correctly classified images by applying small perturbations. We demonstrate that natural adversarial samples commonly occur, even within the training set, and show that many of these images remain misclassified even with additional training epochs. This phenomenon is surprising because correcting the misclassification, particularly when guided by training data, should require only a small adjustment to the DCNN parameters.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.