Paper detail

Are debris disks self-stirred?

This paper considers the evidence that debris disks are self-stirred by the formation of Plutos. A model for the dust produced during self-stirring is applied to statistics for A stars. As there is no significant difference between excesses of A-stars <50Myr old, we focus on reproducing the broad trends, the &#34;rise and fall&#34; of the fraction of stars with excesses. Using a population model, we find that the statistics and trends can be reproduced with a self-stirring model of planetesimal belts with radii distributed between 15-120AU. Disks must have this 15AU minimum radius to show a peak in disk fraction, rather than a monotonic decline. Populations of extended disks with fixed inner and/or outer radii fail to fit the statistics, due mainly to the slow 70um evolution as stirring moves further out in the disk. This conclusion, that debris disks are narrow belts, is independent of the significance of 24um trends for young A-stars. We show that the statistics can also be reproduced with a model in which disks are stirred by secular perturbations from a nearby eccentric planet. Detailed imaging is therefore the best way to characterise the stirring mechanism. From a more detailed look at beta Pictoris Moving Group and TW Hydrae Association A-stars we find that the disk around beta Pictoris is likely the result of secular stirring by the proposed planet at ~10AU; the structure of the HR 4796A disk also points to sculpting by a planet. The two other stars with disks, HR 7012 and eta Tel, possess transient hot dust, though the outer eta Tel disk is consistent with a self-stirred origin. Planet formation provides a natural explanation for the belt-like nature of debris disks, with inner regions cleared by planets that may also stir the disk, and the outer edges set by where planetesimals can form. [abridged]

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.