Paper detail

Are bottom PDFs needed at the LHC?

Processes involving bottom quarks play a crucial role in the LHC phenomenology, from flavour physics to Higgs characterisation and as a window to new physics, appearing both as signals and irreducible background in BSM searches. These processes can be described in QCD either in a 4-flavor or 5-flavor scheme. In the former, $b$ quarks appear only in the final state and are considered massive. In 5-flavor schemes, calculations include $b$ quarks in the initial state. Possibly large logarithms originating from the collinear splitting of gluons into bottom pairs are resummed into the $b$ parton distribution function (PDF). In this contribution, I describe a simple method to assess the size of the logarithms in processes initiated by bottom quarks and show how a substantial and justified agreement between calculations in the two schemes can be achieved. As a consequence both calculations can be used in different context. To conclude, an overview of the current studies aiming to generalise the current appraisal is given and some preliminary results are discussed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.