Paper detail

Are Astrophysical "Black" Holes Leaky?

We continue a study by Adler and Ramazano\uglu (AR) of "black" holes as modified by a scale invariant dark energy action. For the spherically symmetric Schwarzschild-like case, (AR) found that there is no event horizon; hence spacetime is not divided by the "black" hole into causally disconnected regions. We review the formalism for locating trapped surfaces and apparent horizons, and show that the modified "black" hole has no trapped surfaces. Thus one suspects that it is "leaky", and that there will be a "black hole wind" of particles streaming out from the location of the nominal horizon. This will have astrophysical consequences, for example, the wind may feed and stabilize star formation in the vicinity of the "black" hole. We initiate a study of the stationary axially-symmetric rotating "black" hole as modified by a scale invariant dark energy action, i.e, one that is Kerr-like. To set up the axial case, we note that the conserving completion of the dark energy stress energy tensor can be calculated algebraically by solving a $2 \times 2$ matrix equation. Using Mathematica we calculate and simplify the modified system of Einstein equations for the axial case in quasi-isotropic coordinates, and give appropriate boundary conditions. Solution of these equations, which may require developing a special purpose numerical program, is rendered tricky by a residual general coordinate invariance of quasi-isotropic coordinates. This leads to the interesting mathematical question of representing a positive planar function as the gradient squared of a harmonic function.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.