Paper detail

Are Active Galactic Nuclei the Solution to the Excess Cosmic Radio Background at 1.4 GHz?

Recently the ARCADE 2 experiment measured the cosmic radio background (CRB) and found the brightness temperature of the CRB at 1.4 GHz to be ~480 mK. Integrating the flux density from the observed 1.4 GHz radio source count produces a brightness temperature of ~100 mK---less than a quarter of the observed CRB at 1.4 GHz. Radio quiet AGN are a large fraction of the 1.4 GHz uJy sources and typically host significant star formation. Thus, it is possible that AGN and host star formation could be responsible for some fraction of the excess CRB at 1.4 GHz. Here, an X-ray background population synthesis model is used in conjunction with empirical radio to X-ray luminosity ratios to calculate the AGN contribution to the CRB at 1.4 GHz including the emission from host star formation. It is found that AGN and host star formation contribute <~9% of the CRB at 1.4 GHz. When all known 1.4 GHz radio source classes are considered, <~60% of the CRB at 1.4 GHz is accounted for; therefore, it is necessary that either known radio sources evolve significantly at flux densities below current survey sensitivity limits or a new population of low flux density radio sources exist.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.