Paper detail

Are 140 Characters Enough? A Large-Scale Linkability Study of Tweets

Microblogging is a very popular Internet activity that informs and entertains great multitudes of people world-wide via quickly and scalably disseminated terse messages containing all kinds of newsworthy utterances. Even though microblogging is neither designed nor meant to emphasize privacy, numerous contributors hide behind pseudonyms and compartmentalize their different incarnations via multiple accounts within the same, or across multiple, site(s). Prior work has shown that stylometric analysis is a very powerful tool capable of linking product or service reviews and blogs that are produced by the same author when the number of authors is large. In this paper, we explore linkability of tweets. Our results, based on a very large corpus of tweets, clearly demonstrate that, at least for relatively active tweeters, linkability of tweets by the same author is easily attained even when the number of tweeters is large. We also show that our linkability results hold for a set of actual Twitter users who tweet from multiple accounts. This has some obvious privacy implications, both positive and negative.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.