Paper detail

Architecture of planetary systems predicted from protoplanetary disks observed with ALMA II: evolution outcomes and dynamical stability

Recent ALMA observations on disk substructures suggest the presence of embedded protoplanets in a large number disks. The primordial configurations of these planetary systems can be deduced from the morphology of the disk substructure and serve as initial conditions for numerical investigation of their future evolution. Starting from the initial configurations of 12 multi-planetary systems deduced from ALMA disks, we carried out two-stage N-body simulation to investigate the evolution of the planetary systems at the disk stage as well as the long term orbital stability after the disk dispersal. At the disk stage, our simulation includes both the orbital migration and pebble/gas accretion effects. We found a variety of planetary systems are produced and can be categorised into distant giant planets, Jupiter-like planets, Neptune-like planets and distant small planets. We found the disk stage evolution as well as the final configurations are sensitive to both the initial mass assignments and viscosity. After the disk stage, we implement only mutual gravity between star and planets and introduce stochastic perturbative forces. All systems are integrated for up to 10 Gyr to test their orbital stability. Most planetary systems are found to be stable for at least 10 Gyr with perturbative force in a reasonable range. Our result implies that a strong perturbation source such as stellar flybys is required to drive the planetary system unstable. We discuss the implications of our results on both the disk and planet observation, which may be confirmed by the next generation telescopes such as JWST and ngVLA.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.