Paper detail

Archipelagos of Total Bound and Free Entanglement. II

In the indicated preceding preprint (I), we reported the results of, in particular interest here, certain three-parameter qubit-ququart ($2 \times 4$) and two-ququart ($4 \times 4$) analyses. In them, we relied upon entanglement constraints given by Li and Qiao. However, further studies of ours conclusively show--using the well-known necessary and sufficient conditions for positive-semidefiniteness that all leading minors (of separable components, in this context) be nonnegative--that certain of the constraints given are flawed and need to be replaced (by weaker ones). Doing so, leads to a new set of results, somewhat qualitatively different and, in certain respects, simpler in nature. For example, bound-entanglement probabilities of $\frac{2}{3} \left(\sqrt{2}-1\right) \approx 0.276142$, $\frac{1}{4} \left(3-2 \log ^2(2)-\log (4)\right) \approx 0.1632$, $\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3 π^2} \approx 0.432453$ and $\frac{1}{6}$, are reported for various implementations of constraints. We also adopt the Li-Qiao three-parameter framework to a two-parameter one, with interesting visual results.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.