Archipelagos of Total Bound and Free Entanglement. II

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

In the indicated preceding preprint (I), we reported the results of, in particular interest here, certain three-parameter qubit-ququart (2×42 \times 4) and two-ququart (4×44 \times 4) analyses. In them, we relied upon entanglement constraints given by Li and Qiao. However, further studies of ours conclusively show--using the well-known necessary and sufficient conditions for positive-semidefiniteness that all leading minors (of separable components, in this context) be nonnegative--that certain of the constraints given are flawed and need to be replaced (by weaker ones). Doing so, leads to a new set of results, somewhat qualitatively different and, in certain respects, simpler in nature. For example, bound-entanglement probabilities of 23(2−1)≈0.276142\frac{2}{3} \left(\sqrt{2}-1\right) \approx 0.276142, 14(3−2log⁡2(2)−log⁡(4))≈0.1632\frac{1}{4} \left(3-2 \log ^2(2)-\log (4)\right) \approx 0.1632, 12−23π2≈0.432453\frac{1}{2}-\frac{2}{3 π^2} \approx 0.432453 and 16\frac{1}{6}, are reported for various implementations of constraints. We also adopt the Li-Qiao three-parameter framework to a two-parameter one, with interesting visual results.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.