Paper detail

Archimedean superrigidity of solvable S-arithmetic groups

Let $\Ga$ be a connected, solvable linear algebraic group over a number field~$K$, let $S$ be a finite set of places of~$K$ that contains all the infinite places, and let $\theints$ be the ring of $S$-integers of~$K$. We define a certain closed subgroup~$\GOS$ of $\Ga_S = \prod_{v \in S} \Ga_{K_v}$ that contains $\Ga_{\theints}$, and prove that $\Ga_{\theints}$ is a superrigid lattice in~$\GOS$, by which we mean that finite-dimensional representations $α\colon \Ga_{\theints} \to \GL_n(\real)$ more-or-less extend to representations of~$\GOS$. The subgroup~$\GOS$ may be a proper subgroup of~$\Ga_S$ for only two reasons. First, it is well known that $\Ga_{\theints}$ is not a lattice in~$\Ga_S$ if $\Ga$ has nontrivial $K$-characters, so one passes to a certain subgroup $\GS$. Second, $\Ga_{\theints}$ may fail to be Zariski dense in $\GS$ in an appropriate sense; in this sense, the subgroup $\GOS$ is the Zariski closure of~$\Ga_{\theints}$ in~$\GS$. Furthermore, we note that a superrigidity theorem for many non-solvable $S$-arithmetic groups can be proved by combining our main theorem with the Margulis Superrigidity Theorem.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.