Paper detail

Arc Statistics with Realistic Cluster Potentials. III. a Systematic Effect on Cluster Mass Estimates

It is shown in this paper that deviations of galaxy cluster lenses from spherical symmetry can render mass estimates for galaxy clusters based on the formation of large arcs systematically to high. Numerical models show that the mass needed for producing large arcs in clusters can be notably smaller than expected from simple spherically symmetric lens models. The reason is that the enhanced tidal effect in asymmetric and substructured lenses can compensate for part of the convergence necessary for strong lensing effects. An analytic argument is given to explain why deviations from radial symmetry will in general decrease the required lens mass. Mass estimates assuming radially symmetric lenses are on average too high by a factor of $\simeq1.6$, and with a probability of $\simeq20\%$ by a factor of $\simeq2$.

preprint1994arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.