Paper detail

Arc-consistency and linear programming duality: an analysis of reduced cost based filtering

In Constraint Programming (CP), achieving arc-consistency (AC) of a global constraint with costs consists in removing from the domains of the variables all the values that do not belong to any solution whose cost is below a fixed bound. We analyse how linear duality and reduced costs can be used to find all such inconsistent values. In particular, when the constraint has an ideal Linear Programming (LP) formulation, we show that n dual solutions are always enough to achieve AC (where n is the number of variables). This analysis leads to a simple algorithm with n calls to an LP solver to achieve AC, as opposed to the naive approach based on one call for each value of each domain. It extends the work presented in [German et al., 2017] for satisfaction problems and in [Claus et al., 2020] for the specific case of the minimum weighted alldifferent constraint. We propose some answers to the following questions: does there always exists a dual solution that can prove a value consistent/inconsistent ? given a dual solution, how do we know which values are proved consistent/inconsistent ? can we identify simple conditions for a family of dual solutions to ensure arc-consistency ?

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.