Paper detail

Arbitrary amplitude nucleus-acoustic solitary waves in thermally degenerate plasma systems

A rigorous theoretical investigation is made of arbitrary amplitude nucleus acoustic solitary waves (SWs) in a fully ionized multi-nucleus plasma system (consisting of thermally degenerate electron species and non-degenerate warm light as well as heavy nucleus species). The pseudo-potential approach, which is valid for the arbitrary amplitude SWs, is employed. The subsonic and supersonic nucleus-acoustic SWs (which are found to be compressive) along with their basic features are identified. The basic properties of these subsonic and supersonic nucleus-acoustic SWs are found to be significantly modified by the effects of non and ultra-relativistically degenerate electron species, dynamics of heavy nucleus species, number densities as well as adiabatic temperatures of light and heavy nucleus species, etc. It shown that the presence of heavy nucleus species with non-degenerate (isothermal) electron species supports the existence of subsonic nucleus-acoustic SWs, and that the effects of electron degeneracies and light and heavy nucleus temperatures reduce the possibility for the formation of these subsonic nucleus-acoustic SWs. The amplitude of the supersonic nucleus-acoustic SWs in the situation of non-relativistically degenerate electron species is much smaller than that of ultra-relativistically degenerate electron species, but is much larger than that of isothermal electron species. The rise of adiabatic temperature of light or heavy nucleus species causes to decrease (increase) the amplitude (width) of the subsonic and supersonic nucleus acoustic SWs. On the other hand, the increase in the number density of light or heavy nucleus species causes to increase (decrease) the amplitude (width) of the subsonic and supersonic nucleus acoustic SWs. The results of this investigation are found to be applicable in laboratory, space, and astrophysical plasma systems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.