Paper detail

Apsidal motion in massive eccentric binaries: The case of CPD-41$^\circ$7742, and HD 152218 revisited

This paper is part of a study of the apsidal motion in close eccentric massive binary systems, which aims to constrain the internal structure of the stars. We focus on the binary CPD-41°7742 and revisit HD152218. Independent studies of CPD-41°7742 in the past showed large discrepancies in the longitude of periastron of the orbit, hinting at the presence of apsidal motion. We perform a consistent analysis of all observational data, explicitly accounting for the apsidal motion. We use spectroscopic and photometric observations of CPD-41°7742 to infer values for the fundamental stellar and binary parameters. We apply a disentangling method to the spectra to simultaneously derive the RVs at the times of observation and reconstruct the individual stellar spectra. These are analysed by means of CMFGEN to determine the stellar properties. We determine the apsidal motion rate in two ways: We complement our RVs with those reported in the literature and we use the phase shifts between the primary and secondary eclipses. The light curves are analysed by means of Nightfall to constrain the orbital inclination and stellar masses. Stellar structure and evolution models are constructed with Cles. Different prescriptions for the mixing are adopted. Photometric data of HD152218 are analysed and stellar evolution models are built. The binary CPD-41°7742 displays apsidal motion at a rate of 15.38+0.42-0.51° yr-1. Our analysis of the observational data of CPD-41°7742 explicitly accounting for the apsidal motion allows us to explain the discrepancy in periastron longitudes. The age estimates are in good agreement with estimates obtained for other massive binaries in NGC 6231. This study confirms the need for enhanced mixing in the stellar evolution models to reproduce the observational stellar properties; this points towards larger convective cores than usually considered.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.