Paper detail

Approximations for STERGMs Based on Cross-Sectional Data

Temporal exponential-family random graph models (TERGMs) are a flexible class of network models for the dynamics of tie formation and dissolution. In practice, separable TERGMs (STERGMs) are the subclass most often used, as these permit estimation from inexpensive cross-sectional study designs, and benefit from approximations designed to reduce the computational burden. Improving the approximations are the focus of this paper. We extend the work of Carnegie et al., which addressed the problem of constructing a STERGM with two specific equilibrium properties: a cross-sectional distribution defined by a given exponential-family random graph model (ERGM), and tie durations defined by given constant hazards of dissolution. We start with Carnegie et al.'s observation that the exact result is tractable in the dyad-independent case, and then show that taking the sparse limit of the exact result leads to a different approximation than the one they presented. We show that the new approximation outperforms theirs for sparse, dyad-independent models, and that for dyad-dependent models the errors tend to increase with the level of dependence for both approximations. We then extend the theoretical results of Carnegie et al. to the dyad-dependent case, proving that both the old and new approximations are asymptotically exact as the STERGM time step size goes to zero, for arbitrary dyad-dependent terms and some dyad-dependent constraints. We also show that the continuous-time limit of the discrete-time approximations has exactly the combination of cross-sectional and durational equilibrium behavior that we seek.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.