Paper detail

Approximation Schemes for Binary Quadratic Programming Problems with Low cp-Rank Decompositions

Binary quadratic programming problems have attracted much attention in the last few decades due to their potential applications. This type of problems are NP-hard in general, and still considered a challenge in the design of efficient approximation algorithms for their solutions. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the approximability for a class of such problems where the constraint matrices are {\it completely positive} and have low {\it cp-rank}. In the first part of the paper, we show that a completely positive rational factorization of such matrices can be computed in polynomial time, within any desired accuracy. We next consider binary quadratic programming problems of the following form: Given matrices $Q_1,...,Q_n\in\mathbb{R}_+^{n\times n}$, and a system of $m$ constrains $x^TQ_ix\le C_i^2$ ($x^TQ_ix\ge C_i^2$), $i=1,...,m$, we seek to find a vector $x^*\in \{0,1\}^n$ that maximizes (minimizes) a given function $f$. This class of problems generalizes many fundamental problems in discrete optimization such as packing and covering integer programs/knapsack problems, quadratic knapsack problems, submodular maximization, etc. We consider the case when $m$ and the cp-ranks of the matrices $Q_i$ are bounded by a constant. Our approximation results for the maximization problem are as follows. For the case when the objective function is nonnegative submodular, we give an $(1/4-ε)$-approximation algorithm, for any $ε>0$; when the function $f$ is linear, we present a PTAS. We next extend our PTAS result to a wider class of non-linear objective functions including quadratic functions, multiplicative functions, and sum-of-ratio functions. The minimization problem seems to be much harder due to the fact that the relaxation is {\it not} convex. For this case, we give a QPTAS for $m=1$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.