Paper detail

Approximation of barter exchanges with cycle length constraints

We explore the clearing problem in the barter exchange market. The problem, described in the terminology of graph theory, is to find a set of vertex-disjoint, length-restricted cycles that maximize the total weight in a weighted digraph. The problem has previously been shown to be NP-hard. We advance the understanding of this problem by the following contributions. We prove three constant inapproximability results for this problem. For the weighted graphs, we prove that it is NP-hard to approximate the clearing problem within a factor of 14/13 under general length constraints and within a factor of 434/433 when the cycle length is not longer than 3. For the unweighted graphs, we prove that this problem is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of 698/697. For the unweighted graphs when the cycle length is not longer than 3, we design and implement two simple and practical algorithms. Experiments on simulated data suggest that these algorithms yield excellent performances.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.