Paper detail

Approximating the Minimum Breakpoint Linearization Problem for Genetic Maps without Gene Strandedness

The study of genetic map linearization leads to a combinatorial hard problem, called the {\em minimum breakpoint linearization} (MBL) problem. It is aimed at finding a linearization of a partial order which attains the minimum breakpoint distance to a reference total order. The approximation algorithms previously developed for the MBL problem are only applicable to genetic maps in which genes or markers are represented as signed integers. However, current genetic mapping techniques generally do not specify gene strandedness so that genes can only be represented as unsigned integers. In this paper, we study the MBL problem in the latter more realistic case. An approximation algorithm is thus developed, which achieves a ratio of $(m^2+2m-1)$ and runs in $O(n^7)$ time, where $m$ is the number of genetic maps used to construct the input partial order and $n$ the total number of distinct genes in these maps.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.