Paper detail

Approximating Quadratic 0-1 Programming via SOCP

We consider the problem of approximating Quadratic O-1 Integer Programs with bounded number of constraints and non-negative constraint matrix entries, which we term as PIQP. We describe and analyze a randomized algorithm based on a program with hyperbolic constraints (a Second-Order Cone Programming -SOCP- formulation) that achieves an approximation ratio of $O(a_{max} \frac{n}{β(n)})$, where $a_{max}$ is the maximum size of an entry in the constraint matrix and $β(n) \leq \min_i{W_i} $, where $W_i$ are the constant terms that define the constraint inequalities. We note that by appropriately choosing $β(n)$ the randomized algorithm, when combined with other algorithms that achieve good approximations for smaller values of $ W_i$, allows better algorithms for the complete range of $W_i$. This, together with a greedy algorithm, provides a $O^*(a_{max} n^{1/2} )$ factor approximation, where $O^*$ hides logarithmic terms. Our solution is achieved by a randomization of the optimal solution to the relaxed version of the hyperbolic program. We show that this solution provides the approximation bounds using concentration bounds provided by Chernoff-Hoeffding and Kim-Vu.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.