Paper detail

Approximating Multicut and the Demand Graph

In the minimum Multicut problem, the input is an edge-weighted supply graph $G=(V,E)$ and a simple demand graph $H=(V,F)$. Either $G$ and $H$ are directed (DMulC) or both are undirected (UMulC). The goal is to remove a minimum weight set of edges in $G$ such that there is no path from $s$ to $t$ in the remaining graph for any $(s,t) \in F$. UMulC admits an $O(\log k)$-approximation where $k$ is the vertex cover size of $H$ while the best known approximation for DMulC is $\min\{k, \tilde{O}(n^{11/23})\}$. These approximations are obtained by proving corresponding results on the multicommodity flow-cut gap. In contrast to these results some special cases of Multicut, such as the well-studied Multiway Cut problem, admit a constant factor approximation in both undirected and directed graphs. Motivated by both concrete instances from applications and abstract considerations, we consider the role that the structure of the demand graph $H$ plays in determining the approximability of Multicut. In undirected graphs our main result is a $2$-approximation in $n^{O(t)}$ time when the demand graph $H$ excludes an induced matching of size $t$. This gives a constant factor approximation for a specific demand graph that motivated this work. In contrast to undirected graphs, we prove that in directed graphs such approximation algorithms can not exist. Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), for a large class of fixed demand graphs DMulC cannot be approximated to a factor better than worst-case flow-cut gap. As a consequence we prove that for any fixed $k$, assuming UGC, DMulC with $k$ demand pairs is hard to approximate to within a factor better than $k$. On the positive side, we prove an approximation of $k$ when the demand graph excludes certain graphs as an induced subgraph. This generalizes the Multiway Cut result to a much larger class of demand graphs.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.