Paper detail

Approximate Hypergraph Coloring under Low-discrepancy and Related Promises

A hypergraph is said to be $χ$-colorable if its vertices can be colored with $χ$ colors so that no hyperedge is monochromatic. $2$-colorability is a fundamental property (called Property B) of hypergraphs and is extensively studied in combinatorics. Algorithmically, however, given a $2$-colorable $k$-uniform hypergraph, it is NP-hard to find a $2$-coloring miscoloring fewer than a fraction $2^{-k+1}$ of hyperedges (which is achieved by a random $2$-coloring), and the best algorithms to color the hypergraph properly require $\approx n^{1-1/k}$ colors, approaching the trivial bound of $n$ as $k$ increases. In this work, we study the complexity of approximate hypergraph coloring, for both the maximization (finding a $2$-coloring with fewest miscolored edges) and minimization (finding a proper coloring using fewest number of colors) versions, when the input hypergraph is promised to have the following stronger properties than $2$-colorability: (A) Low-discrepancy: If the hypergraph has discrepancy $\ell \ll \sqrt{k}$, we give an algorithm to color the it with $\approx n^{O(\ell^2/k)}$ colors. However, for the maximization version, we prove NP-hardness of finding a $2$-coloring miscoloring a smaller than $2^{-O(k)}$ (resp. $k^{-O(k)}$) fraction of the hyperedges when $\ell = O(\log k)$ (resp. $\ell=2$). Assuming the UGC, we improve the latter hardness factor to $2^{-O(k)}$ for almost discrepancy-$1$ hypergraphs. (B) Rainbow colorability: If the hypergraph has a $(k-\ell)$-coloring such that each hyperedge is polychromatic with all these colors, we give a $2$-coloring algorithm that miscolors at most $k^{-Ω(k)}$ of the hyperedges when $\ell \ll \sqrt{k}$, and complement this with a matching UG hardness result showing that when $\ell =\sqrt{k}$, it is hard to even beat the $2^{-k+1}$ bound achieved by a random coloring.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.