Paper detail

Approximate dynamic programming with $(\min,+)$ linear function approximation for Markov decision processes

Markov Decision Processes (MDP) is an useful framework to cast optimal sequential decision making problems. Given any MDP the aim is to find the optimal action selection mechanism i.e., the optimal policy. Typically, the optimal policy ($u^*$) is obtained by substituting the optimal value-function ($J^*$) in the Bellman equation. Alternately $u^*$ is also obtained by learning the optimal state-action value function $Q^*$ known as the $Q$ value-function. However, it is difficult to compute the exact values of $J^*$ or $Q^*$ for MDPs with large number of states. Approximate Dynamic Programming (ADP) methods address this difficulty by computing lower dimensional approximations of $J^*$/$Q^*$. Most ADP methods employ linear function approximation (LFA), i.e., the approximate solution lies in a subspace spanned by a family of pre-selected basis functions. The approximation is obtain via a linear least squares projection of higher dimensional quantities and the $L_2$ norm plays an important role in convergence and error analysis. In this paper, we discuss ADP methods for MDPs based on LFAs in $(\min,+)$ algebra. Here the approximate solution is a $(\min,+)$ linear combination of a set of basis functions whose span constitutes a subsemimodule. Approximation is obtained via a projection operator onto the subsemimodule which is different from linear least squares projection used in ADP methods based on conventional LFAs. MDPs are not $(\min,+)$ linear systems, nevertheless, we show that the monotonicity property of the projection operator helps us to establish the convergence of our ADP schemes. We also discuss future directions in ADP methods for MDPs based on the $(\min,+)$ LFAs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.