Paper detail

Approximate Capacities of Two-Dimensional Codes by Spatial Mixing

We apply several state-of-the-art techniques developed in recent advances of counting algorithms and statistical physics to study the spatial mixing property of the two-dimensional codes arising from local hard (independent set) constraints, including: hard-square, hard-hexagon, read/write isolated memory (RWIM), and non-attacking kings (NAK). For these constraints, the strong spatial mixing would imply the existence of polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for computing the capacity. It was previously known for the hard-square constraint the existence of strong spatial mixing and PTAS. We show the existence of strong spatial mixing for hard-hexagon and RWIM constraints by establishing the strong spatial mixing along self-avoiding walks, and consequently we give PTAS for computing the capacities of these codes. We also show that for the NAK constraint, the strong spatial mixing does not hold along self-avoiding walks.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.