Paper detail

Approaching Tsirelson's bound in a photon pair experiment

Quantum theory introduces a cut between the observer and the observed system, but does not provide a definition of what is an observer. Based on an informational definition of observer, Grinbaum has recently predicted an upper bound on bipartite correlations in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell scenario equal to 2.82537, which is slightly smaller than the Tsirelson bound of standard quantum theory, but is consistent with all the available experimental results. Not being able to exceed Grinbaum's limit would support that quantum theory is only an effective description of a more fundamental theory and would have a deep impact in physics and quantum information processing. Here we present a test of the CHSH Bell inequality on photon pairs in maximally entangled states of polarization in which a value 2.82759+-0.00051 is observed, violating Grinbaum's bound by 4.3 standard deviations and providing the smallest distance with respect to Tsirelson's bound ever reported, namely, 0.00084+-0.00051. This sets a new lower experimental bound for Tsirelson's bound, strengthening the value of principles that predict Tsirelson's bound as possible explanations of all natural limits of correlations, and has important consequences for cryptographic security, randomness certification, characterization of physical properties in device-independent scenarios, and certification of quantum computation.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.