Paper detail

Applying the Network Item Response Model to Student Assessment Data

This study discusses an alternative tool for modeling student assessment data. The model constructs networks from a matrix item responses and attempts to represent these data in low dimensional Euclidean space. This procedure has advantages over common methods used for modeling student assessment data such as Item Response Theory because it relaxes the highly restrictive local-independence assumption. This article provides a deep discussion of the model and the steps one must take to estimate it. To enable extending a present model by adding data, two methods for estimating the positions of new individuals in the network are discussed. Then, a real data analysis is then provided as a case study on using the model and how to interpret the results. Finally, the model is compared and contrasted to other popular models in psychological and educational measurement: Item response theory (IRT) and network psychometric Ising model for binary data.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.