Paper detail

Application of Causal Inference Techniques to the Maximum Weight Independent Set Problem

A powerful technique for solving combinatorial optimization problems is to reduce the search space without compromising the solution quality by exploring intrinsic mathematical properties of the problems. For the maximum weight independent set (MWIS) problem, using an upper bound lemma which says the weight of any independent set not contained in the MWIS is bounded from above by the weight of the intersection of its closed neighbor set and the MWIS, we give two extension theorems -- independent set extension theorem and vertex cover extension theorem. With them at our disposal, two types of causal inference techniques (CITs) are proposed on the assumption that a vertex is strongly reducible (included or not included in all MWISs) or reducible (contained or not contained in a MWIS). One is a strongly reducible state-preserving technique, which extends a strongly reducible vertex into a vertex set where all vertices have the same strong reducibility. The other, as a reducible state-preserving technique, extends a reducible vertex into a vertex set with the same reducibility as that vertex and creates some weighted packing constraints to narrow the search space. Numerical experiments show that our CITs can help reduction algorithms find much smaller remaining graphs, improve the ability of exact algorithms to find the optimal solutions and help heuristic algorithms produce approximate solutions of better quality. In particular, detailed tests on $12$ representative graphs generated from datasets in Network Data Repository demonstrate that, compared to the state-of-the-art algorithms, the size of remaining graphs is further reduced by more than 32.6%, and the number of solvable instances is increased from 1 to 5.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.