Paper detail

Application of a Steady-State Accretion Disk Model to Spectrophotometry and High-Resolution Spectra of Two Recent FU Ori Outbursts

We apply a conventional accretion disk model to the FU Ori-type objects HBC 722 and Gaia 17bpi. Our base model is a steady-state, thin Keplerian disk featuring a modified Shakura-Sunyaev temperature profile, with each annulus radiating as an area-weighted spectrum given by a NextGen atmosphere at the appropriate temperature. We explore departures from the standard model by altering the temperature distribution in the innermost region of the disk to account for "boundary region"-like effects. We consider the overall spectral energy distribution (SED) as well as medium- and high-resolution spectra in evaluating best-fit models to the data. Parameter degeneracies are studied via a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) parameter estimation technique. Allowing all parameters to vary, we find accretion rates for HBC 722 of $\dot{M} = 10^{-4.90} M_\odot \textrm{ yr}^{-1}\; {}^{+0.99}_{-0.40} \textrm{ dex}$ and for Gaia 17bpi of $\dot{M} = 10^{-6.70} M_\odot \textrm{ yr}^{-1}\; {}^{+0.46}_{-0.36} \textrm{ dex}$; the corresponding maximum disk temperatures are $7100_{-500}^{+300}$ K and $7900_{-400}^{+900}$ K, respectively. While the accretion rate of HBC 722 is on the same order as other FU Ori-type objects, Gaia 17bpi has a lower rate than previously reported as typical, commensurate with its lower luminosity. Alternate models that fix some disk or stellar parameters are also presented, with tighter confidence intervals on the remaining fitted parameters. In order to improve upon the somewhat large credible intervals for the $\dot{M}$ values, and make progress on boundary layer characterization, flux-calibrated ultraviolet spectroscopy is needed.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.