Paper detail

APOGEE DR16: a multi-zone chemical evolution model for the Galactic disc based on MCMC methods

The analysis of the APOGEE DR16 data suggests the existence of a clear distinction between two sequences of disc stars at different Galactocentric distances in the [$α$/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] abundance ratio space: the so-called high-$α$ sequence, classically associated to an old population of stars in the thick disc, and the low-$α$ sequence, which mostly comprises relatively young stars in the thin disc. We perform a Bayesian analysis based on a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to constrain a multi-zone two-infall chemical evolution model designed for regions at different Galactocentric distances using measured chemical abundances from the APOGEE DR16 sample. An inside-out formation of the Galaxy disc naturally emerges from the best fit of our two-infall chemical-evolution model to APOGEE-DR16: inner Galactic regions are assembled on shorter time-scales compared to the external ones. In the outer disc (with radii $R>6$ kpc), the chemical dilution due to a late accretion event of gas with primordial chemical composition is the main driver of the [Mg/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] abundance pattern in the low-$α$ sequence. In the inner disc, in the framework of the two-infall model, we confirm the presence of an enriched gas infall in the low-$α$ phase as suggested by chemo-dynamical models. Our Bayesian analysis of the recent APOGEE DR16 data suggests a significant delay time, ranging from $\sim$3.0 to 4.7 Gyr, between the first and second gas infall events for all the analyzed Galactocentric regions. Our results propose a clear interpretation of the [Mg/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] relations along the Galactic discs. The signatures of a delayed gas-rich merger which gives rise to a hiatus in the star formation history of the Galaxy are impressed in the [Mg/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] relation, determining how the low-$α$ stars are distributed in the abundance space at different Galactocentric distances.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.