Paper detail

Aperture-corrected spectroscopic type Ia supernova host galaxy properties

We use type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) data obtained by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey (SDSS-II/SNe) in combination with the publicly available SDSS DR16 fiber spectroscopy of their host galaxies to correlate SNe Ia light-curve parameters and Hubble residuals to several host galaxy properties. Fixed-aperture fiber spectroscopy suffers from aperture effects: the fraction of the galaxy covered by the fiber varies depending on its projected size on the sky, thus measured properties are not representative of the whole galaxy. The advent of Integral Field Spectroscopy has provided a way for correcting the missing light, by studying how these galaxy parameters change with the aperture size. Here we study how the standard SN host galaxy relations change once global host galaxy parameters are corrected for aperture effects. We recover previous trends on SN Hubble residuals with host galaxy properties, but we find that discarding objects with poor fiber coverage instead of correcting for aperture loss introduces biases in the sample that affect SN host galaxy relations. The net effect of applying the commonly used $g$-band fraction criterion is discarding intrinsically faint \mbox{SNe~Ia} in high-mass galaxies, thus artificially increasing the height of the mass step by 0.02 mag and its significance. Current and next generation of fixed-aperture fiber spectroscopy surveys, such as DES, DESI or TiDES in 4MOST, that aim at study SN and galaxy correlations must consider, and correct for, these effects.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.