Paper detail

Anti-retroviral therapy for HIV: who should we test and who should we treat?

In most countries CD4+ cell counts are still used for deciding when to start HIV-positive people on anti-retroviral therapy. However, various CD4+ thresholds, 200, 350 or 500/\muL, are chosen arbitrarily and for historical reasons. Here we consider the optimal CD4+ threshold at which asymptomatic HIV-positive people living in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe should start treatment depending on their prognosis given their CD4+ cell counts or viral load. We also examine the optimal interval at which people should be retested if they are HIV-negative. This analysis shows that while the use of CD4+ cell counts or viral load tests could have been useful in deciding how to triage patients for treatment at the start of the epidemic this is no longer the case except possibly for those aged about 15 to 25 years. In order not to do harm to individual patients everyone should be started on ART as soon as they are found to be HIV-positive.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.