Paper detail

Anti-Poiseuille Flow: Increased Vortex Velocity at Superconductor Edges

Using the time-dependent Ginzburg Landau equations we study vortex motion driven by an applied current in two dimensional superconductors in the presence of a physical boundary. At smaller sourced currents the vortex lattice moves as a whole, with each vortex moving at the same velocity. At larger sourced current, vortex motion is organized into channels, with vortices in channels nearer to the sample edges moving faster than those farther away from sample edges, opposite to the Poiseuille flow of basic hydrodynamics where the velocity is lowest at the boundaries. At intermediate currents, a stick-slip motion of the vortex lattice occurs in which vortices in the channel at the boundary break free from the Abrikosov lattice, accelerate, move past their neighbors and then slow down and reattach to the vortex lattice at which point the stick-slip process starts over. These effects could be observed experimentally, e.g. using fast scanning microscopy techniques.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.