Anti-concentration and the Exact Gap-Hamming Problem

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

We prove anti-concentration bounds for the inner product of two independent random vectors, and use these bounds to prove lower bounds in communication complexity. We show that if A,BA,B are subsets of the cube {±1}n\{\pm 1\}^n with ∣A∣⋅∣B∣≥21.01n|A| \cdot |B| \geq 2^{1.01 n}, and X∈AX \in A and Y∈BY \in B are sampled independently and uniformly, then the inner product ⟨X,Y⟩\langle X,Y \rangle takes on any fixed value with probability at most O(1/n)O(1/\sqrt{n}). In fact, we prove the following stronger "smoothness" statement: max⁡k∣Pr⁡[⟨X,Y⟩=k]−Pr⁡[⟨X,Y⟩=k+4]∣≤O(1/n). \max_{k } \big| \Pr[\langle X,Y \rangle = k] - \Pr[\langle X,Y \rangle = k+4]\big| \leq O(1/n). We use these results to prove that the exact gap-hamming problem requires linear communication, resolving an open problem in communication complexity. We also conclude anti-concentration for structured distributions with low entropy. If x∈Znx \in \mathcal{Z}^n has no zero coordinates, and B⊆{±1}nB \subseteq \{\pm 1\}^n corresponds to a subspace of F2n\mathcal{F}_2^n of dimension 0.51n0.51n, then max⁡kPr⁡[⟨x,Y⟩=k]≤O(ln⁡(n)/n)\max_k \Pr[\langle x,Y \rangle = k] \leq O(\sqrt{\ln (n)/n}).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.