Paper detail

Anti-concentration and the Exact Gap-Hamming Problem

We prove anti-concentration bounds for the inner product of two independent random vectors, and use these bounds to prove lower bounds in communication complexity. We show that if $A,B$ are subsets of the cube $\{\pm 1\}^n$ with $|A| \cdot |B| \geq 2^{1.01 n}$, and $X \in A$ and $Y \in B$ are sampled independently and uniformly, then the inner product $\langle X,Y \rangle$ takes on any fixed value with probability at most $O(1/\sqrt{n})$. In fact, we prove the following stronger "smoothness" statement: $$ \max_{k } \big| \Pr[\langle X,Y \rangle = k] - \Pr[\langle X,Y \rangle = k+4]\big| \leq O(1/n).$$ We use these results to prove that the exact gap-hamming problem requires linear communication, resolving an open problem in communication complexity. We also conclude anti-concentration for structured distributions with low entropy. If $x \in \mathcal{Z}^n$ has no zero coordinates, and $B \subseteq \{\pm 1\}^n$ corresponds to a subspace of $\mathcal{F}_2^n$ of dimension $0.51n$, then $\max_k \Pr[\langle x,Y \rangle = k] \leq O(\sqrt{\ln (n)/n})$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.