Abstract

In contrast with the notion of complexity, a set AA is called anti-complex if the Kolmogorov complexity of the initial segments of AA chosen by a recursive function is always bounded by the identity function. We show that, as for complexity, the natural arena for examining anti-complexity is the weak-truth table degrees. In this context, we show the equivalence of anti-complexity and other lowness notions such as r.e.\ traceability or being weak truth-table reducible to a Schnorr trivial set. A set AA is anti-complex if and only if it is reducible to another set BB with \emph{tiny use}, whereby we mean that the use function for reducing AA to BB can be made to grow arbitrarily slowly, as gauged by unbounded nondecreasing recursive functions. This notion of reducibility is then studied in its own right, and we also investigate its range and the range of its uniform counterpart.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.