Paper detail

Anthropic Argument for Three Generations

The standard model of particle physics contains N_gen=3 generations of quarks and leptons, i.e., two sets of three particles in each sector, with the two sets differing by 1 unit of charge in each. All 12 "predicted" particles are now experimentally accounted for, and there are strong (though not air-tight) arguments that there are no more than three generations. The question is: why exactly N_gen=3? I argue that three generations is a natural prediction of the multiverse theory, provided one adds the additional, quite reasonable assumption that N_gen in a randomly realized universe is a steeply falling function of number. In this case N_gen > 2 to permit CP violation (and so baryogenesis and thus physicists) and N_gen < 4 to avoid highly improbable outcomes. I thereby make a testable anthropic-principle prediction: that when a theory of randomly realized N_gen is developed, the probability will turn out to be steeply falling in N_gen.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.