Paper detail

ANSIG - An Analytic Signature for Arbitrary 2D Shapes (or Bags of Unlabeled Points)

In image analysis, many tasks require representing two-dimensional (2D) shape, often specified by a set of 2D points, for comparison purposes. The challenge of the representation is that it must not only capture the characteristics of the shape but also be invariant to relevant transformations. Invariance to geometric transformations, such as translation, rotation, and scale, has received attention in the past, usually under the assumption that the points are previously labeled, i.e., that the shape is characterized by an ordered set of landmarks. However, in many practical scenarios, the points describing the shape are obtained from automatic processes, e.g., edge or corner detection, thus without labels or natural ordering. Obviously, the combinatorial problem of computing the correspondences between the points of two shapes in the presence of the aforementioned geometrical distortions becomes a quagmire when the number of points is large. We circumvent this problem by representing shapes in a way that is invariant to the permutation of the landmarks, i.e., we represent bags of unlabeled 2D points. Within our framework, a shape is mapped to an analytic function on the complex plane, leading to what we call its analytic signature (ANSIG). To store an ANSIG, it suffices to sample it along a closed contour in the complex plane. We show that the ANSIG is a maximal invariant with respect to the permutation group, i.e., that different shapes have different ANSIGs and shapes that differ by a permutation (or re-labeling) of the landmarks have the same ANSIG. We further show how easy it is to factor out geometric transformations when comparing shapes using the ANSIG representation. Finally, we illustrate these capabilities with shape-based image classification experiments.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.