Paper detail

Anonymous On-line Communication Between Program Analyses

We propose a light-weight client-server model of communication between existing implementations of different program analyses. The communication is on-line and anonymous which means that all analyses simultaneously analyse the same program and an analysis does not know what other analyses participate in the communication. The anonymity and model's strong emphasis on independence of analyses allow to preserve almost everything in existing implementations. An analysis only has to add an implementation of a proposed communication protocol, determine places in its code where information from others would help, and then check whether there is no communication scenario, which would corrupt its result. We demonstrate functionality and effectiveness of the proposed communication model in a detailed case study with three analyses: two abstract interpreters and the classic symbolic execution. Results of the evaluation on SV-COMP benchmarks show impressive improvements in computed invariants and increased counts of successfully analysed benchmarks.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.