Paper detail

Anomaly Search over Composite Hypotheses in Hierarchical Statistical Models

Detection of anomalies among a large number of processes is a fundamental task that has been studied in multiple research areas, with diverse applications spanning from spectrum access to cyber-security. Anomalous events are characterized by deviations in data distributions, and thus can be inferred from noisy observations based on statistical methods. In some scenarios, one can often obtain noisy observations aggregated from a chosen subset of processes. Such hierarchical search can further minimize the sample complexity while retaining accuracy. An anomaly search strategy should thus be designed based on multiple requirements, such as maximizing the detection accuracy; efficiency, be efficient in terms of sample complexity; and be able to cope with statistical models that are known only up to some missing parameters (i.e., composite hypotheses). In this paper, we consider anomaly detection with observations taken from a chosen subset of processes that conforms to a predetermined tree structure with partially known statistical model. We propose Hierarchical Dynamic Search (HDS), a sequential search strategy that uses two variations of the Generalized Log Likelihood Ratio (GLLR) statistic, and can be used for detection of multiple anomalies. HDS is shown to be order-optimal in terms of the size of the search space, and asymptotically optimal in terms of detection accuracy. An explicit upper bound on the error probability is established for the finite sample regime. In addition to extensive experiments on synthetic datasets, experiments have been conducted on the DARPA intrusion detection dataset, showing that HDS is superior to existing methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.