Paper detail

Anomalously Narrow Linewidths of Compact Massive Star-Forming Galaxies at z~2.3: A Possible Inclination Bias in the Size-Mass Plane

Compact, massive star forming galaxies at $z\sim2.5$ are thought to be building the central regions of giant elliptical galaxies today. However, a significant fraction of these objects were previously shown to have much smaller H$α$ line widths than expected. A possible interpretation is that H$α$ emission from their central regions, where the highest velocities are expected, is typically obscured by dust. Here we present ALMA observations of the CO(3-2) emission line of three compact, massive galaxies with H$α$ line widths of FWHM(H$α$)$\sim$125-260 km s$^{-1}$ to test this hypothesis. Surprisingly, in all three galaxies, the CO line width is similar to the H$α$ line width: we find FWHM(CO)$\sim$165 km s$^{-1}$ for all three galaxies whereas FWHM(CO)$\sim$450-700 km s$^{-1}$ was expected from a simple virial estimator. These results show that the narrow H$α$ linewidths of many compact massive star-forming galaxies are not due to preferential obscuration of the highest velocity gas. An alternative explanation for the narrow line widths is that the galaxies are disks that are viewed nearly face-on. We suggest that there may be an inclination bias in the size-mass plane, such that the apparent rest-frame optical sizes of face-on galaxies are smaller than those of edge-on galaxies. Although not conclusive, this hypothesis is supported by an observed anti-correlation between the size and axis ratio of massive galaxies.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.