Paper detail

Anomalous Strength Characteristics of Tilt Grain Boundaries in Graphene

Using molecular dynamics simulations and first principles calculations, we have studied the structure and mechanical strength of tilt grain boundaries in graphene sheets that arise during CVD growth of graphene on metal substrates. Surprisingly, we find that for tilt boundaries in the vicinity of both the zig-zag and arm-chair orientations, large angle boundaries with a higher density of 5-7 defect pairs are stronger than the low-angle boundaries which are comprised of fewer defects per unit length. Interestingly, the trends in our results cannot be explained by a continuum Griffith-type fracture mechanics criterion, which predicts the opposite trend due to that fact that it does not account for the critical bonds that are responsible for the failure mechanism. We have identified the highly-strained bonds in the 7-member rings that lead to the failure of the sheets, and we have found that large angle boundaries are able to better accommodate the strained 7-rings. Our results provide guidelines for designing growth methods to obtain grain boundary structures that can have strengths close to that of pristine graphene.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.