Paper detail

Anomalous Higgs interactions in dimensional deconstruction

Recent LHC experiments have revealed that Higgs is light. As an interesting candidate to accommodate light Higgs, in this paper we adopt the scenario of dimensional deconstruction, where Higgs is redarded as a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson. Though the scenario is formulated in ordinary 4-dimensional space-time, it may also be interpreted as "latticized" gauge-Higgs unification. We point out that in this scenario Higgs interaction with matter field is anomalous, i.e. its coupling deviates from what the standard model predicts. The interplay between the periodicity of physical observables in the Higgs field and the violation of translational invariance along the extra-space due to the latticization is argued to play an essential role to get the anomalous interaction. Though the predicted anomalous Higgs interaction has much similarity to the one in the gauge-Higgs unification, in the case of dimensional deconstruction the anomaly exists even if we do not introduce bulk mass term for the chiral fermion realized by orbifolding, in clear contrast to the case of gauge-Higgs unification. It in turn means that the anomaly goes away in the continuum limit of the extra-space.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.