Paper detail

Anomalous Expansion of the Copper-Apical Oxygen Distance in Superconducting La$_{2}$CuO$_{4}$ - La$_{1.55}$Sr$_{0.45}$CuO$_{4}$ Bilayers

We have introduced an improved X-ray phase-retrieval method with unprecedented speed of convergence and precision, and used it to determine with sub-Ångstrom resolution the complete atomic structure of an ultrathin superconducting bilayer film, composed of La$_{1.55}$Sr$_{0.45}$CuO$_{4}$ and La$_{2}$CuO$_{4}$ neither of which is superconducting by itself. The results show that phase-retrieval diffraction techniques enable accurate measurement of structural modifications in near-surface layers, which may be critically important for elucidation of surface-sensitive experiments. Specifically we find that close to the sample surface the unit cell size remains constant while the copper-apical oxygen distance shows a dramatic increase, by as much as 0.45 Å. The apical oxygen displacement is known to have a profound effect on the superconducting transition temperature.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.