Paper detail

Annealed estimates on the Green function

We consider a random, uniformly elliptic coefficient field $a(x)$ on the $d$-dimensional integer lattice $\mathbb{Z}^d$. We are interested in the spatial decay of the quenched elliptic Green function $G(a;x,y)$. Next to stationarity, we assume that the spatial correlation of the coefficient field decays sufficiently fast to the effect that a logarithmic Sobolev inequality holds for the ensemble $\langle\cdot\rangle$. We prove that all stochastic moments of the first and second mixed derivatives of the Green function, that is, $\langle|\nabla_x G(x,y)|^p\rangle$ and $\langle|\nabla_x\nabla_y G(x,y)|^p\rangle$, have the same decay rates in $|x-y|\gg 1$ as for the constant coefficient Green function, respectively. This result relies on and substantially extends the one by Delmotte and Deuschel \cite{DeuschelDelmotte}, which optimally controls second moments for the first derivatives and first moments of the second mixed derivatives of $G$, that is, $\langle|\nabla_x G(x,y)|^2\rangle$ and $\langle|\nabla_x\nabla_y G(x,y)|\rangle$. As an application, we are able to obtain optimal estimates on the random part of the homogenization error even for large ellipticity contrast.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.