Paper detail

Anisotropy expectations for ultra-high-energy cosmic rays with future high statistics experiments

UHECRs have attracted a lot of attention due to their challengingly high energies and their potential value to constrain physical processes and astrophysical parameters in the most energetic sources of the universe. Current detectors have failed to detect significant anisotropies which had been expected to allow source identification. Some indications about the UHECR composition, which may become heavier at the highest energies, has even put into question the possibility that such a goal could be achieved soon. We investigate the potential value of a new-generation detector, with 10 times larger exposure, to overcome the current situation and make significant progress in the detection of anisotropies and thus in the study of UHECRs. We take as an example the expected performances of the JEM-EUSO, assuming a uniform full-sky coverage with a total exposure of 300,000 km2 sr yr. We simulate realistic UHECR sky maps for a wide range of possible astrophysical scenarios allowed by the current constraints, taking into account the energy losses and photo-dissociation of the UHECRs, as well as their deflections by magnetic fields. These sky maps, built for the expected statistics of JEM-EUSO as well as for the current Auger statistics, as a reference, are analyzed from the point of view of their intrinsic anisotropies, using the two-point correlation function. A statistical study of the resulting anisotropies is performed for each astrophysical scenario, varying the UHECR source composition and spectrum as well as the source density. We find that significant anisotropies are expected to be detected by a next-generation UHECR detector, for essentially all the astrophysical scenarios studied, and give precise, quantitative meaning to this statement. Our results show that a gain of one order of magnitude in exposure would make a significant difference compared to the existing detectors.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.