Paper detail

Anisotropic fluid spheres in the framework of $f(R,\mathcal{T})$ gravity theory

The main aim of this paper is to obtain analytic relativistic anisotropic spherical solutions in f(R,$\mathcal{T}$) scenario. To do so we use modified Durgapal-Fuloria metric potential and the isotropic condition is imposed in order to obtain the effective anisotropic factor $\tildeΔ$. Besides, a notable and viable election on f(R,$\mathcal{T}$) gravity formulation is taken. Specifically $f(R,\mathcal{T})=R+2χ\mathcal{T}$, where $R$ is the Ricci scalar, $\mathcal{T}$ the trace of the energy-momentum tensor and $χ$ a dimensionless parameter. This choice of $f(R,\mathcal{T})$ function modifies the matter sector only, including new ingredients to the physical parameters that characterize the model such as density, radial, and tangential pressure. Moreover, other important quantities are affected such as subliminal speeds of the pressure waves in both radial and transverse direction, observational parameters, for example, the surface redshift which is related with the total mass $M$ and the radius $r_{s}$ of the compact object. Also, a transcendent mechanism like equilibrium through generalized Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equation and stability of the system are upset. We analyze all the physical and mathematical general requirements of the configuration taking $M=1.04 M_{\odot}$ and varying $χ$ from $-0.1$ to $0.1$. It is shown by the graphical procedure that $χ<0$ yields to a more compact object in comparison when $χ\geq0$ (where $χ=0.0$ corresponds to general relativity theory) and increases the value of the surface redshift. However, negative values of $χ$ introduce in the system an attractive anisotropic force (inward) and the configuration is completely unstable (corroborated employing Abreu's criterion). Furthermore, the model in Einstein gravity theory presents cracking while for $χ>0$ the system is fully stable.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.