Paper detail

Angular Momentum Transport in Protoplanetary and Black-Hole Accretion Disks: The Role of Parasitic Modes in the Saturation of MHD Turbulence

The magnetorotational instability (MRI) is considered a key process for driving efficient angular momentum transport in astrophysical disks. Understanding its non-linear saturation constitutes a fundamental problem in modern accretion disk theory. The large dynamical range in physical conditions in accretion disks makes it challenging to address this problem only with numerical simulations. We analyze the concept that (secondary) parasitic instabilities are responsible for the saturation of the MRI. Our approach enables us to explore dissipative regimes that are relevant to astrophysical and laboratory conditions that lie beyond the regime accessible to current numerical simulations. We calculate the spectrum and physical structure of parasitic modes that feed off the fastest, exact (primary) MRI mode when its amplitude is such that the fastest parasitic mode grows as fast as the MRI. We argue that this "saturation" amplitude provides an estimate of the magnetic field that can be generated by the MRI before the secondary instabilities suppress its growth significantly. Recent works suggest that the saturation amplitude of the MRI depends mainly on the magnetic Prandtl number. Our results suggest that, as long as viscous effects do not dominate the fluid dynamics, the saturation level of the MRI depends only on the Elsasser number $Λ_η$. We calculate the ratio between the stress and the magnetic energy density, $α_{\rm sat}β_{\rm sat}$, associated with the primary MRI mode. We find that for $Λ_η>1$ Kelvin-Helmholtz modes are responsible for saturation and $α_{\rm sat}β_{\rm sat} = 0.4$, while for $Λ_η< 1$ tearing modes prevail and $α_{\rm sat}β_{\rm sat} \simeq 0.5 \, Λ_η$. Several features of MRI simulations in accretion disks surrounding young stars and compact objects can be interpreted in terms of our findings.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.